ufind.best ufind.best

Searching our database...

Navigate Select
Search by name or category
Am I On Track? Tracker Logo

Am I On Track? Tracker

Track your progress and align actions with goals

Screenshot 1 of Am I On Track? Tracker Screenshot 2 of Am I On Track? Tracker Screenshot 3 of Am I On Track? Tracker

A placing, not a percentage: #12 of the 14 tools that launched that week. First place reads 90, last reads 35, and the scores compare only within one week.

Judged 14 September 2026 under measure 2026-09-08.v25. Scores compare products within one launch week. We keep making the judges' questions stricter, so a score from another week was set against a different measure.

Market signal

Demand proven, distinction limited

Demand is visible; product differentiation is the main constraint. The research snapshot found 0 direct and 2 adjacent alternatives.

Existing Jury ratings
Demand Mercury
73
Differentiation Uranus
39
Product strength Execution, UX, Trust & Practical value
57
Market scope Market scope unclear

No reliable geographic or language constraint was visible in the public product information.

Similar tools found

0 direct · 2 adjacent

2
Adjacent options visible Unclear Broad comparison
Broader market 2

Visible approaches: all-in-one productivity platform, collaborative project management platform.

Examples: ClickUp, Jira Cloud

Named alternatives found in this public research snapshot, not a complete market census. The count and approach mix explain the review and add no points.

Research coverage Broad coverage
88

The snapshot spans the main research angles and several independent platforms.

Pain 1 Demand 3 Alternatives 5 Quality 4

Specialist score profile

All six ratings
Demand 73 Uniqueness 39 Execution 35 UX 77 Trust 60 Value 69

Each spoke is one independent specialist. A smaller side makes the main constraint visible immediately.

This report explains the published specialist ratings and 13 public sources across 10 platforms. Research coverage is not an extra score and adds no points.

Execution

Mars specialist · 15%

#14 of 14 35/100

Placed last because the tracker form is visible and likely usable, but there is the least independent proof beyond the maker page itself, and no shown result state, output, or deeper workflow. It stays above zero because a real input form is present. Total 3.5/5.

  • Page shows a working-looking tracker form with tabs, numeric inputs, date fields, and an 'Am I On Track?' action button. Product page

User experience

Venus specialist · 10%

#4 of 14 77/100

The tracker itself is visible on the landing page, with readable fields and a direct action, “Am I On Track?” It ranks below P12 because the cookie/privacy box partially stands between arrival and a clean first look. Total: 4/5.

  • The first screen contains the actual tracker inputs for goal target, current progress, start date, and deadline. Product page
  • The main button is labeled exactly “Am I On Track?”, which names the output directly. Product page
  • A privacy/cookie panel is visible over the page, partially obstructing the experience. Product page

Trust

Saturn specialist · 10%

#8 of 14 60/100

It places above P5 because the tracker’s claim is modest and the calculator is visibly present, with company and policy links shown; however, the page also displays many unverifiable featured-on badges that weaken trust.

  • Largest claim is helping users understand whether current actions are aligned with future goals through measurable pacing calculations. Product page
  • Reachable page shows a working-looking tracker with goal target, progress, start date, deadline, and category tabs. Product page
  • Footer names NASSUNA LEGACY LLC and includes Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Refund and Returns Policy, Cookie Policy, and Sitemap. Product page

Uniqueness

Uranus specialist · 30%

#13 of 14 39/100

Above P4 only because its goal-pacing framing is slightly more specific than a generic browser reflex test, but I could not name a concrete unmatched capability beyond positioning. Total 0/5.

Practical value

Jupiter specialist · 10%

#6 of 14 69/100

Total 2.5/5. It sits below P4 because its result is a pacing judgment rather than a richer measurable output set, but above P9 since the user still gets an immediate decision with no account gate.

  • Tool asks for goal target, current progress, start date, and deadline, then returns 'Am I On Track?' Product page
  • Description says it reveals measurable progress, time remaining, and daily pacing calculations. Product page
  • No sign-up, payment, or install gate is shown before using the tracker, and no export/download is visible. Product page

Market demand

Mercury specialist · 25%

#5 of 14 73/100

Monthly band. The job is checking whether current actions are on pace for goals. Total 3.5/5; above P9 because goal tracking is a settled work habit with broader durability, even though evidence is mostly adjacent rather than for this exact personal pacing tool.

  • Job can be stated plainly: compare progress against goals and see whether current actions are on track. Product page
  • Typical use appears monthly or weekly in work and personal productivity systems, though exact cadence for this tool is unclear. reddit.com indiehackers.com okrstool.com
  • Independent evidence shows people seek project tools with goals and progress tracking, and OKR software emphasizes this job. reddit.com getapp.com getapp.com

Every specialist function rates every launch. A weekly category leader label marks the highest score in that measure, can be shared on an exact tie, and adds no extra points.

How weekly voting works

No Deals Available

Currently, there are no special deals or discounts available for this tool.

Asking Price

$17,000

Contact Seller

TTM Revenue

$0

TTM Profit

$0

Last month revenue

$0

Business Details

Date founded
2025-04-01
Team Size
1
Contact Email
[email protected]
Tech Stack
Wasp, React, Shadcn-UI + TailwindCSS, Prisma + Postgres, hosted on fly.io