ufind.best ufind.best

Searching our database...

Navigate Select
Search by name or category
List My Site Logo

List My Site

Manual SaaS directory submissions to 100+ high-DR platforms

Screenshot 1 of List My Site Screenshot 2 of List My Site Screenshot 3 of List My Site Screenshot 4 of List My Site

A placing, not a percentage: #19 of the 19 tools that launched that week. First place reads 90, last reads 35, and the scores compare only within one week.

Judged 12 October 2026 under measure 2026-09-08.v25. Scores compare products within one launch week. We keep making the judges' questions stricter, so a score from another week was set against a different measure.

Market signal

Early or weak signal

Public evidence does not yet show both strong need and a distinct answer. The research snapshot found 13 direct and 4 adjacent alternatives.

Existing Jury ratings
Demand Mercury
41
Differentiation Uranus
38
Product strength Execution, UX, Trust & Practical value
42
Market scope Market scope unclear

No reliable geographic or language constraint was visible in the public product information.

Similar tools found

13 direct · 4 adjacent

17
Crowded snapshot Mixed approaches Broad comparison
Same market 12 Broader market 1 Scope unclear 1 Different market 3

Visible approaches: managed directory submission service, manual directory submission service, product discovery platform, link exchange service.

Examples: AutoSaaSLaunch, EasySubmits, Findly.tools, GetMoreBacklinks

Named alternatives found in this public research snapshot, not a complete market census. The count and approach mix explain the review and add no points.

Research coverage Broad coverage
98

The snapshot spans the main research angles and several independent platforms.

Pain 1 Demand 2 Alternatives 8 Adoption 1 Quality 2

Specialist score profile

All six ratings
Demand 41 Uniqueness 38 Execution 38 UX 41 Trust 41 Value 50

Each spoke is one independent specialist. A smaller side makes the main constraint visible immediately.

This report explains the published specialist ratings and 14 public sources across 12 platforms. Research coverage is not an extra score and adds no points.

Execution

Mars specialist · 15%

#18 of 19 38/100

Placed above P12 because it at least shows testimonials, process, pricing, and claimed live snapshots for a manual service, while P12’s visible state is an application error with no confirmed running product. Total 2/5.

  • Landing page presents a manual submission service with process steps, pricing, and testimonial snapshots, but no directly usable tool. Product page

User experience

Venus specialist · 10%

#17 of 19 41/100

Above P7 because the service is understandable from the first screen and the CTA at least starts the purchase flow for the named service. It sits below P8 because there is no first-screen control that performs submissions; the page is mainly sales copy and testimonials.

  • The hero states the offer as directory submissions to help rank on Google and LLMs, making the service understandable quickly. Product page
  • The visible CTA is “Get Started,” which is generic and does not name the output; no working submission interface is shown on the first screen. Product page

Trust

Saturn specialist · 10%

#17 of 19 41/100

It sits above P17 because it at least shows pricing, process, and a bounded service scope, even if ranking and citation outcomes are not controllable. It sits below P19 because 'get cited by ChatGPT' and ranking promises materially outrun what directory submissions can guarantee.

  • Largest claim is manual submissions to 100+ directories that boost rankings and get cited by ChatGPT; the page shows pricing, submission counts, and testimonial-style proof. Product page
  • Claims include DR jumps and Google/LLM ranking benefits, but these outcomes are not directly verifiable from the reachable evidence. Product page

Uniqueness

Uranus specialist · 30%

#18 of 19 38/100

Total 0.0. It beats P2 only because the service is at least targeted to SaaS directory submissions rather than general fitness retail. But I could not name one specific thing comparable submission services do not already do.

Practical value

Jupiter specialist · 10%

#14 of 19 50/100

Total 2.5/5. It ranks above P19 because the visitor can name the result as directory submissions and tracking proof, but below P17 since payment is required before first real result and the job still depends on later SEO effects elsewhere.

  • Page offers manual SaaS directory submissions to 100+ platforms with live tracking and screenshots. Product page
  • Pricing is a one-time $169 payment for 100 directory submissions. Product page
  • The deliverable is a service outcome and proof artifacts, not an immediate self-serve result on arrival. Product page

Market demand

Mercury specialist · 25%

#17 of 19 41/100

First in the a-few-times-a-year band: submitting a SaaS to directories is a launch/distribution task that recurs only around launches or campaigns. Total 3.0/5, above P14 because there is clearer workflow evidence and somewhat broader business use.

Every specialist function rates every launch. A weekly category leader label marks the highest score in that measure, can be shared on an exact tie, and adds no extra points.

Public research trail

14 relevant sources across 12 platforms. Every link used by the report remains inspectable.

Research snapshot: SaaS directory submission service

Pain 1 Demand 2 Alternatives 8 Adoption 1 Quality 2
How weekly voting works

No Deals Available

Currently, there are no special deals or discounts available for this tool.

Asking Price

$17,000

Contact Seller

TTM Revenue

$0

TTM Profit

$0

Last month revenue

$0

Business Details

Date founded
2025-04-01
Team Size
1
Contact Email
[email protected]
Tech Stack
Wasp, React, Shadcn-UI + TailwindCSS, Prisma + Postgres, hosted on fly.io