ufind.best ufind.best

Searching our database...

Navigate Select
Search by name or category
VoteStay Logo

VoteStay

Vote together on where your group stays

Screenshot 1 of VoteStay Screenshot 2 of VoteStay Screenshot 3 of VoteStay

A placing, not a percentage: #5 of the 20 tools that launched that week. First place reads 90, last reads 35, and the scores compare only within one week.

Judged 6 October 2026 under measure 2026-09-08.v25. Scores compare products within one launch week. We keep making the judges' questions stricter, so a score from another week was set against a different measure.

Market signal

Distinct, still unproven

The approach stands apart, while demand needs stronger public proof. The research snapshot found 0 direct and 1 adjacent alternatives.

Existing Jury ratings
Demand Mercury
52
Differentiation Uranus
84
Product strength Execution, UX, Trust & Practical value
73
Market scope Market scope unclear

No reliable geographic or language constraint was visible in the public product information.

Similar tools found

0 direct · 1 adjacent

1
Adjacent options visible Unclear Limited comparison
Broader market 1

Visible approaches: live polls.

Examples: WePlanify

Named alternatives found in this public research snapshot, not a complete market census. The count and approach mix explain the review and add no points.

Research coverage Solid coverage
69

The snapshot is useful, with some evidence gaps still visible.

Pain 2 Demand 4 Alternatives 1 Quality 1

Specialist score profile

All six ratings
Demand 52 Uniqueness 84 Execution 70 UX 84 Trust 84 Value 55

Each spoke is one independent specialist. A smaller side makes the main constraint visible immediately.

This report explains the published specialist ratings and 8 public sources across 5 platforms. Research coverage is not an extra score and adds no points.

Execution

Mars specialist · 15%

#8 of 20 70/100

VoteStay shows a usable party-creation form with trip name and user name fields plus a start button, matching the promised group-voting setup. It ranks below P18 because the visible tool state is earlier in the workflow and no voting screen is directly reachable here. Total 3.5/5.

  • VoteStay shows a usable party-creation form with trip name and user name fields plus a start button, matching the promised group-voting setup. It ranks below P18 because the visibl... Product page

User experience

Venus specialist · 10%

#3 of 20 84/100

Third at 4.5/5. It beats the next product because the homepage itself lets a newcomer begin the core task with a visible trip-name form and “Start a party,” while the product purpose is immediately clear in one sentence.

  • Third at 4.5/5. It beats the next product because the homepage itself lets a newcomer begin the core task with a visible trip-name form and “Start a party,” while the product purpo... Product page

Trust

Saturn specialist · 10%

#3 of 20 84/100

Trust is strong because the core promise is modest and reachable: create a party, paste hotel links, and vote. It places above P10 by clearly disclaiming non-affiliation with booking sites and showing the exact workflow.

  • Largest claim is group voting on hotel links from booking sites; landing page and Booking.com page describe a concrete three-step process. Product page
  • Footer explicitly says VoteStay is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by listed booking sites. Product page

Uniqueness

Uranus specialist · 30%

#3 of 20 84/100

Total 3/5. Its distinct thing is head-to-head voting on pasted hotel links with a leaderboard for choosing one stay, a narrower accommodation-selection workflow than generic trip polls. That visible stay-specific flow puts it above CartLens.

  • Product page says users paste hotel links, vote head-to-head, and use a leaderboard to pick the stay. Product page
  • Visible inner page is specifically for booking-site accommodation links, indicating a stay-selection workflow rather than generic polling. Product page
  • Adjacent alternative evidence describes broad live polls, not a hotel-link comparison flow. weplanify.com

Practical value

Jupiter specialist · 10%

#13 of 20 55/100

Thirteenth at about 2.5/5: the user gets a group decision and a share code without accounts, which is practical for choosing a stay. It ranks below P13 because the final booking still happens elsewhere, so the harder half is not fully done.

  • Thirteenth at about 2.5/5: the user gets a group decision and a share code without accounts, which is practical for choosing a stay. It ranks below P13 because the final booking st... Product page

Market demand

Mercury specialist · 25%

#14 of 20 52/100

A few-times-a-year band. The job is helping a group choose accommodation by voting. It totals 3.5/5, but sits below P12 because group-trip stay selection happens less often per person than founder launch submissions across multiple projects or updates.

Every specialist function rates every launch. A weekly category leader label marks the highest score in that measure, can be shared on an exact tie, and adds no extra points.

How weekly voting works

No Deals Available

Currently, there are no special deals or discounts available for this tool.

Asking Price

$17,000

Contact Seller

TTM Revenue

$0

TTM Profit

$0

Last month revenue

$0

Business Details

Date founded
2025-04-01
Team Size
1
Contact Email
[email protected]
Tech Stack
Wasp, React, Shadcn-UI + TailwindCSS, Prisma + Postgres, hosted on fly.io